The author’s attempt at theoretical reflection of the concept of fragmentation in modern theoretical aesthetics is presented. It is shown that the principle of fragmentation is a prerequisite and condition for a specific method of research, which is radically opposed to the classical tradition of philosophy in the works of J. Deleuze and F. Guattari. The genesis of the concept of fragmentation as one of the forms of movement of discontinuity is considered in the context of the unified theory of fractality developed by the author. It has been established that the development of one’s own definitions of fragmentation requires a deepening of reflection on the universal-logical level in the context of the categories of Hegel’s dialectical logic. It is argued that the formation of fragmentation as a principle is associated with the intention of turning a thought into a representation, with the replacement of the primacy of the Idea with a “corporeal event” and the subsequent restructuring of the categorical attitudes of representatives of postmodernism.
The principle of fragmentation in the light of theoretical reflection
Written by M.Yu.Morozov
Keywords: fragmentation, integrity, Hegel, dialectic, postmodernism, fractality, Baudrillard, simulation..
References
- Bodrijjar Zh. Prozrachnost’ zla / Per. s fr. L. Ljubarskoj i E. Markovskoj. M.: Dobrosvet: KDU, 2009. 257 s.
- Bodrijjar Zh. Paroli. Ot fragmenta k fragmentu. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktorija, 2006. 196 s. (Akademicheskij bestseller).
- Burik M. L. Chelovek i jekonomika v virtualizirovannom mire. M.: Agrar Media Grup, 2016. 268 s.
- Gegel’ G. V. F. Sochinenija: v 14 t. 1929—1958. T. 5: Nauka logiki / Per. B. G. Stolpnera. M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo,1937. 714 s.
- Deljo Zh., Gvattari, F. Chto takoe filosofija? M.: Institut jeksperimental’noj sociologii; Spb.: Aletejja, 1998. 288 s.
- Kant I. Sochinenija: v 6 t. 1963—1966. T. 3: Kritika chistogo razuma. M.: Mysl’, 1964. 799 s.
- Literaturnaja jenciklopedija: v 11 t. T. 6. M.: Sovetskaja jenciklopedija, 1932. 920 s.
- Lifshic M. A. Pochemu ja ne modernist? M.: Iskusstvo — XXI vek, 2009. 626 s. (Filosofskie tetradi).
- Mareev S. N., Mareeva E. V. Istorija filosofii (obshhij kurs): uchebnoe posobie. M.: Akademicheskij Proekt, 2003. 880 s.
- Morozov M. Ju. Protivorechie nepreryvnosti i diskretnosti kak sushhestvennoe opredelenie fraktal’nogo // Problemy sovremennogo obrazovanija. 2021. № 5. S. 9—22; URL: http://pmedu.ru/images/2021-5/922.pdf (data obrashhenija 14.05.2022).
- Nabokov V. V. Lekcii po russkoj literature. M.: Nezavisimaja Gazeta, 1996. 440 s.
- Nabokov V. V. Lekcii po zarubezhnoj literature. M.: Nezavisimaja Gazeta, 1999. 440 s.
- Tarasenko V. V. Poznanie kak fraktal’noe bluzhdanie v mire [Jelektronnyj resurs] // Moskovskij mezhdunarodnyj sinergeticheskij forum: [sajt]. URL: https://www.rinotel.ru/fractal/poznanie-kak-fraktalnoe-bluzhdanie-v-mire.html (data obrashhenija 14.05.2022).
- Chernyshevskij N. G. Bednost’ ne porok. A. Ostrovskogo // Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: v 15 t. 1939—1953. T. 2: Stat’i i recenzii. M.: Goslitizdat, S. 232—240.