doi: 10.24151/2409-1073-2023-1-140-147

Abstract. From a philosophical perspective, the author looks at the foundations of collective
practices in the modern world and analyses the specifi cs of the new, global level of problems in social
being. The author emphasizes the role of constructivist methodology in transforming objects
of state architectonics and in addition substantiates the signifi cance of the concepts of dialogism,
relativism and pragmatism as applied to forms of self-organization. The analysis has identifi ed
points of growth for addressing a wide range of issues in social practice. Finally, the link between
consolidation of eff orts and resources have been outlined.

Keywords: collective practices, consolidation, dialogism, constructivism, relativism, pragmatism,
resources, intelligence, social being, world order, methodology

For citation: Ravochkin N. N. “Philosophical Foundations of Collective Practices of Modernity”.
Economic and Social Research 1 (37) (2023): 140—147. (In Russian). https://doi.
org/10.24151/2409-1073-2023-1-140-147

References
1. Alexeyeva Tatiana A. “Think Like Constructivist:
Discovering a Polyphonic World”.
Sravnitel’naya politika = Comparative Politics
Russia 5.1 (2014): 4—21. (In Russian). EDN:
RTZSOV.
2. Gordeev I. “Specific Features of the Global
Policy in the Post-Modern Era”. Vlast’ = The
Authority 3 (2008): 79—82. (In Russian). EDN:
KARAKH.
3. Grebenyuk A. A. “Information and Psychological
Security and Simulacrization of Science in
a Modern Transitive Society”. Chelovek — Priroda
— Obshchestvo: Teoriya i praktika bezopasnosti
zhiznedeyatel’nosti, ekologii i valeologii 6 (13)
(2020):15—21. (In Russian). EDN: BLKUYW.

4. Dzhokhadze Igor. “Pragmatism and War”. Istoriya
fi losofi i = History of Philosophy 20.1 (2015):
193—214. (In Russian). EDN: VUCBKP.
5. Kazantsev A. A. “ ‘Constructivist Revolution’,
or About the Role of Cultural and Civilizational
Factors in the Modern Theory of International
Relations”. Politicheskaya nauka = Political
Science (RU) 4 (2009): 88—114. (In Russian).
EDN: KXOWUZ.
6. Kosarev A. V., Volf M. N. “Joseph Margolis’s
Neo-Pragmatism”. Idei i idealy = Ideas and Ideals
2.2 (32) (2017): 3—16. (In Russian). https://
doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2017-2.2-3-16
7. Kochergin Albert N. “The Role of Dialogism
Concept in the Civilization’s Fortune
(M. M. Bakhtin, M. Buber, K. Jaspers)”. Gumanitariy:
aktual’nyye problemy gumanitarnoy
nauki i obrazovaniya = Russian Journal of the
Humanities 2 (38) (2017): 45—52. (In Russian).
EDN: ZIGAYB.
8. Lantsov S. A. “The Carribean Missile Crisis in
International Relations of the XXth Century:
Theoretical and Practical-Political Aspects”.
Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS = Political
Expertise: POLITEX 9.2 (2013): 131—136. (In
Russian). EDN: RTDBCR.
9. Ravochkin Nikita N., Knyazev Nikolai A.,
Kruglova Inna N., Leopa Aleksandr V.,
Shtumpf Svetlana P. “The Problem of Ideas
in the Context of Social Constructivism”.
Kontekst i refl eksiya: fi losofi ya o mire i cheloveke
= Context and Refl ection: Philosophy of
the World and Human Being 9.3A (2020): 148—
157. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.34670/
AR.2020.37.41.017
10. Soboleva M. E. “On Possibility of Dialog Between
Cultures”. Voprosy fi losofi i 3 (2009): 147—
157. (In Russian). EDN: JWLMVJ.
11. Tumanova O. I. “Political Representation and
Representative Democracy in the Philosophy of
F. Ankersmith”. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo
universiteta. Seriya: Filosofi ya = Herald of
Tver State University. Series: Philosophy 1 (59)
(2022): 216—223. (In Russian). https://doi.
org/10.26456/vtphilos/2022.1.216