The authors have developed an algorithm for philosophical analysis of corruption taking into account the trajectory of practical use of theoretical knowledge in interdisciplinary anti-corruption activities. A philosophical methodological toolkit for understanding corruption and elements of corruption through the definition of an object, subject, goal, specifics and research algorithm is considered. The problems of the multidimensionality of the phenomenon of corruption in the system of national and social security are analyzed. The importance of philosophical understanding of the corruption risks of our time is actualized. The conclusion about the importance of philosophical knowledge in the methodology of combating corruption is formulated, the need for further development of the technology for combating corruption is actualized.
Keywords: anti-corruption, corruption, algorithm for understanding corruption, socio-philosophical analysis, anti-corruption education
References
- Berkut V. P. Social’no-filosofskij analiz v metodologii nauchnogo poznanija [SOCIO-PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS IN OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE METHODOLOGY] // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Serija: Filosofskie nauki. 2016. № 1. S. 14—23.
- Bikeev I. I., Kabanov P. A. Antikorrupcionnoe prosveshhenie: voprosy teorii i praktiki: v 3 t. T. 3. Kazan’: Poznanie, 2019. 240 s.
- Burmakin V. M. Korrupcionnye i predkorrupcionnye situacii (social’no-filosofskij aspekt) [CORRUPTION AND PRE-CORRUPTION SITUATIONS (SOCIOPHILOSOPHICAL ASPECT)] // Kontekst i refleksija: filosofija o mire i cheloveke. 2020. T. 9. № 5A. S. 139—147.
- Dimant Eugen, Tosato Guglielmo. Causes and Effects of Corruption: What has Past Decade’s Empirical Research Taught us? A Survey // Journal of Economic Surveys. 2016. Vol. 32, № 2. P. 335—356.
- Izotov M. O. Korrupcija v sovremennoj Rossii: sociokul’turnye osnovanija i formy projavlenija: avtoref… dis. kand. filos. nauk. Ivanovo, 2012. 24 s.
- Menocal Alina. Why corruption matters: understanding causes, effects and how to address them. Evidence paper on corruption. DFID Eviden. 2015. 89 s.
- Miller Seumas. Corruption [Electronic resource] // Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy / Ed. Edward N. Zalta. 2018. URL https://plato.stanford. edu/archives/win2018/entries/corruption/ (data obrashhenija 06.05.2021).
- Momdzhjan K. X. O situacii v sovremennom teoreticheskom obshhestvoznanii, ili krizis fragmentacii i kak s nim borot’sja [ON SITUATION IN CONTEMPORARY THEORETICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, OR CRISIS OF FRAGMENTATION AND HOW TO ATTACK IT] // Lichnost’, kul’tura, obshhestvo. 2002. T. IV. Vyp. 3–4. C. 76—92.
- Momdzhjan K. Vozvrashhajas’ k poisku istin: eshhe raz o sostojanii sovremennoj social’noj filosofii [RETURNING TO THE SEARCH FOR TRUTH: ONCE AGAIN ON THE STATUS OF CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY] // Voprosy filosofii. 2021. № 2. S. 29—41.
- Nisnevich Ju. A. Korrupcija v istoricheskoj retrospektive s utochnenijami i dopolnenijami [HISTORICAL RETROSPECTION OF CORRUPTION: SPECIFIED AND SUPPLEMENTED] // Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. 2015 № 3 S. 90—100.
- Platon. Gosudarstvo. Sobranie sochinenij: v 4 t. M.: Mysl’, 1990—1994. T. 4 / [per. s drevnegrecheskogo A. N. Egunova i dr.]. 1994. 830 s.
- Safonov A. L., Bondareva Ja. V. «Udushajushhaja ljubov’» neklassiki ili analiz prichin prevrashhenija fundamental’noj nauki v mifologiju [«CHOKING LOVE» OF NON-CLASSICS OR ANALYSIS OF THE REASONS FOR THE TRANSFORMATION OF FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCE INTO MYTHOLOGY] // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija: Filosofija. 2020. № 3(53). S. 27—38.
- Sartor Michael, Beamish Paul. Private Sector Corruption, Public Sector Corruption and the Organizational Structure of Foreign Subsidiaries // Journal of Business Ethics. 2020. 10.1007/s10551- 019-04148-1.
- Vorster Schalk W. (2013). Fighting corruption — a philosophical approach // In die Skriflig. № 47(1). P. 266—272.
- Cyrendorzhieva D. Sh., Lugavcov K. V. Korrupcija kak ugroza nacional’noj bezopasnosti: osmyslenie v terminah teorii riska [CORRUPTION AS THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY: THE INTERPRETATION IN TERMS OF THE THEORY OF RISK] // Tambov: Gramota, 2017. № 11(85). S. 187—189.
- Jakovleva E. L.: 1) Korrupcionnye riski glamurnoj ideologii // Vestnik razvitija nauki i obrazovanija. 2017. № 5—6. S. 92—101; 2) Filosofskoe osmyslenie specifiki glamurnoj ideologicheskoj konstrukcii // Gumanitarij: aktual’nye problemy gumanitarnoj nauki i obrazovanija. 2018. T. 18. № 1(41). S. 90—101.