doi: 10.24151/2409-1073-2023-1-37-46

Abstract. Social and economic problems, such as unemployment, sectoral discrimination,
lack of integration of young people into economic and political processes at various levels, presence
of barriers hampering young people’s access to social elevators like education and employment,
are characterized as unfavorable conditions for the development of modern youth. Unemployment
and the “not in education, employment or training” phenomenon are viewed as the most
acute and urgent socio-economic problems. The authors consider social youth entrepreneurship
as one of the solutions to the problem of youth employment. They have also pointed out that social
entrepreneurship has a synergistic eff ect, having a positive impact on social and environmental
processes in local communities, providing young people with access to sources of income, education
and self-development, pointing out ways of social transformation, infl uencing both values and
institutions.

Keywords: youth entrepreneurship, unemployment, social development, innovation, ecology,
values

For citation: Dobrynina M. V., Andreeva A. A. “Youth Social Entrepreneurship as a Driver of
Economic and Social Progress of Modern Society”. Economic and Social Research 1 (37) (2023):
37—46. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24151/2409-1073-2023-1-37-46

References
1. Bosma Niels, Levie Jonathan. “Global Entrepreneurship
Monitor: 2009 Global Report”. GEM.
Global Entrepreneurship Research Association,
2010. Web. 07 March 2023. <https://www.gemconsortium.
org/report/gem-2009-global-report>.

2. Clarke Amelia, Dougherty Ilona. “Youth-
Led Social Entrepreneurship: Enabling Social
Change”. International Review of Entrepreneurship
8.2 (2010): 133—156. Web.
07 March 2023. <https://www.senatehall.
com/entrepreneurship?article=384>.
3. Delgado Melvin. Social Youth Entrepreneurship:
The Potential for Youth and Community Transformation.
Westport, CT: Praeger, 2004. 240 p.
4. Eichhorst Werner, Rinne Ulf. “Promoting
Youth Employment through Activation Strategies:
Employment Working Paper No. 163”.
International Labour Office. 24 Nov. 2014.
Web. 07 March 2023. <https://www.ilo.org/
employment/Whatwedo/Publications/working-
papers/WCMS_322411/lang--en/index.
htm>.
5. International Labour Organization. Global Employment
Trends for Youth 2020: Technology and
the Future of Jobs. Geneva: ILO, 2020. 184 p.
6. Greene Laina Ravendran, Tan Audrey, Hawkins
Lizzy. Sustainable Impact: How Women are
Key to Ending Poverty. Singapore: Partridge,
2017. 186 p.
7. Ho Elaine, Clarke Amelia, Dougherty Ilona.
“Youth-Led Social Change: Topics, Engagement
Types, Organizational Types, Strategies,
and Impacts”. Futures 67 (2015): 52—62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.01.006
8. Kourilsky Marilyn L., Walstad William B.,
Thomas Andrew. The Entrepreneur in Youth: An
Untapped Resource for Economic Growth, Social
Entrepreneurship, and Education. Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar, 2007. 166 p. New Horizons in
Entrepreneurship series.
9. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Leaving No One Behind: The Imperative
of Inclusive Development: Report on the World
Social Situation 2016, ST/ESA/362. New York:
United Nations, 2016. xviii, 164 p.
10. Rahdari Amir, Sepasi Sahar, Moradi Mohammad.
“Achieving Sustainability through
Schumpeterian Social Entrepreneurship: The
Role of Social Enterprises”. Journal of Cleaner
Production 137 (2016): 347—360. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.159
11. Richter Ralph. “Rural Social Enterprises as Embedded
Intermediaries: The Innovative Power of
Connecting Rural Communities with Supra-
Regional Networks”. Journal of Rural Studies
70 (2017): 179—187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jrurstud.2017.12.005
12. Schøtt Thomas, Kew Penny, Cheraghi Maryam.
“Future Potential: A GEM Perspective
on Youth Entrepreneurship”. GEM. Global

Entrepreneurship Research Association,
2015. Web. 07 March 2023. <https://www.
gemconsortium.org/report/future-potential-agem-
perspective-on-youth-entrepreneurship>.
13. Seelos Christian, Ganly Kate, Mair Johanna.
“Social Entrepreneurs Directly Contribute to
Global Development Goals”. Social Entrepreneurship.
Ed. Johanna Mair, Jeff rey Robinson,
Kai Hockerts. London: Palgrave Macmillan,
2006. 235—275.
14. Sen Pritha. “Ashoka’s Big Idea: Transforming
the World through Social Entrepreneurship”.
Futures 39.5 (2007): 534—553. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.10.013
15. EC Expert Group on Social Entrepreneurship.
“Social Enterprises and the Social Economy
Going Forward: A Call for Action from the
Commission Expert Group on Social Entrepreneurship
(GECES)”. GSG. Oct. 2016. Web.
07 March 2023. <http://gsgii.org/reports/
social-enterprises-and-the-social-economygoing-
forward>.
16. Abdou E., Fahmy A., Greenwald D., Nelson
J. “Social Entrepreneurship in the Middle
East: Toward Sustainable Development for the
Next Generation”. Brookings. 22 Apr. 2010.
Web. 07 March 2023. <https://www.brookings.
edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/04_social_
entrepreneurship.pdf>.
17. Borzaga Carlo, Defourny Jacques, eds. The
Emergence of Social Enterprise. London: Routledge,
2001. 383 p.
18. International Labour Organization. World Employment
and Social Outlook: Trends 2019. Geneva:
ILO, 2019. ix, 121 p.
19. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs,
Population Division. Demographic Profiles.
New York: United Nations, 2019. xxii,
1214 p. Vol. 2 of World Population Prospects
2019. 2 vols.

doi: 10.24151/2409-1073-2023-1-29-36

Abstract. The prospects of risk management through the implementation of anti-crisis resource
management strategy are analyzed. It is suggested that economic actions taken to combat
the COVID-19 virus threat and possible next pandemics are not fully estimated, although they
are very promising. Based on the data on eff ective management strategies implemented during the
COVID-19 pandemic, the prospects for the implementation of anti-crisis resource management
models, tested as well as being under development, are considered. A model of centralized management
of strategic health resources has been proposed.

Keywords: management, resource management, risk management, pandemic, government
regulation, regulated distribution, supply-and-demand dynamics

For citation: Valeev D. N. “Economic Model of Centralized Resource Management in the
Context of Pandemic Risks: Relevance and Prospects of Implementation”. Economic and Social
Research 1 (37) (2023): 29—36. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24151/2409-1073-2023-1-29-36

References
1. Zakharova Irina A. “Economics Crisis Inf
luence in Company Business Decisions and
Possibility to Revise the Business Model as
a Result of the 2020 Crisis Caused by the Pandemic”.
Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye. Elektronnyy
vestnik = e-Journal Public Administration
82 (2020): 22—53. (In Russian). https://doi.
org/10.24411/2070-1381-2020-10092
2. Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation.
State Duma. On Crisis Bailout Plan for Russian
Economy. [Gen. ed. A. G. Aksakov]. Moscow:
Izd. Gos. Dumy, 2015. 318 p., ill., chart. (In
Russian).
3. Simachev Yu. V., Akindinova N. V., Glukhova
M. N., Dolgopyatova T. G., Ershova N. V.,
Kuzyk M. G., Fedyunina A. A., Yakovlev A. A.
Assessment of the Impact of Crisis Related to
COVID-19 Pandemic on Branches of Russian
Economy and Their Post-Crisis Development:
report for 22nd Apr. International
Sci. Conf. on Economy and Society Development
Problems, Moscow, Apr. 13 to 30,
2021. Moscow: Izd. dom VShE, 2021. 45 p.
(In Russian).
4. Rastimeshina Tatiana V. “Democracies and
Autocracies amid the Pandemic: The Matthew
Effect”. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’no-gumanitarnyye
issledovaniya = Economic and Social
Research 1 (29) (2021): 72—81. (In Russian).
https://doi.org/10.24151/2409-1073-2021-1-
72-81
5. “GDP (current US$)”. World Bank. Cop. 2023.
Web. 20 Feb. 2023. <https://data.worldbank.
org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD>.
6. Lulli L. G., Baldassarre A., Mucci N., Arcangeli G.
“Prevention, Risk Exposure, and Knowledge of
Monkeypox in Occupational Settings: A Scoping
Review”. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
7.10 (2022): 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/
tropicalmed7100276
7. Sozinova Anastasia A. “Dataset of Fight against
the Viral Threat Based on Management and
Marketing during the COVID-19 Economic
Crisis. V1”. Mendeley Data. 09 Nov. 2020. Web.
20 Feb. 2023. <https://data.mendeley.com/
datasets/g6p5kjz657>. https://doi.org/10.17632/
g6p5kjz657.1
8. Sozinova Anastasiya A., Popkova Elena G.
“Dataset Analysis of Pandemic Risks and Risk
Management Prospects Based on Management
and Marketing in Conditions of COVID-19
Recession”. Risks 11.2 (2023): 37. https://doi.
org/10.3390/risks11020037

doi: 10.24151/2409-1073-2023-1-15-28

Abstract. In this work, the authors analyzed four methods of cost management: regulatory
method, ABC method, direct costing, and method of cost accounting for responsibility centers —
on the example of AO “Logika”, industrial gas manufacturer based in Zelenograd. The advantages
and disadvantages of these accounting methods were substantiated. The authors have proposed
choices of cost accounting method, optimal for the considered enterprise in terms of development
stability and production process effi ciency.

Keywords: cost management methods, regulatory method, direct costing, activity-based costing,
ABC method, cost drivers, cash pooling agreement, break-even point

For citation: Alatortseva O. A., Malakhova N. A., Mansurova M. K., Sukhareva D. V. “Improvement
of Accounting Methods in the Cost Management System”. Economic and Social Research
1 (37) (2022): 15—28. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24151/2409-1073-2023-1-15-28

References
1. Bolatbiyev A. K., Mirkina O. N. “Cost Management
as Enterprise’s Financial Performance
Impact Factor”. Teoreticheskiye i prikladnyye
aspekty nauchnykh issledovaniy: sbornik statey po
materialam II nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii,
Moskva, 31 yanv. 2017. Moscow: Nauchnyy
konsul’tant, 2017. 8—13. (In Russian).
2. Borisov S. A., Kolesov K. I., Plekhanova A. F. Cost
Management and Controlling, study guide. Nizhny
Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod State Tech. Univ.
n. a. R. E. Alekseev, 2017. 167 p., ill. (In Russian).
3. Kostyukova E. I., ed. Management Accounting, study
guide. Moscow: KnoRus, 2016. 217 p. (In Russian).
4. Kerimov V. E., Komarova N. N., Epifanov A. A.
“Management Accounting Organization According
to ‘Direct Costing’ System”. Audit i fi -
nansovyy analiz = Audit and Financial Analysis
2 (2001): 80—91. (In Russian). EDN: TVJDDT.
5. Kireyeva N. V. Cost Management of a Production
Enterprise with Multiproduct Manufacturing, Extended
Abstract of Dr. Sci. (Econ.) Dissertation.
Chelyabinsk, 2 015. 39 p. (In Russian).
6. Korol’chuk A. O. “Problems of Implementing
the ‘Direct Costing’ System in Russian Organizations”.
Nauchnyye gorizonty 4 (2017): 146—
151. (In Russian).
7. Lebedeva P. M. “Direct Costing, Marginal Costing,
Variable Costing?”. Mezhdunarodnyy bukhgalterskiy
uchet = International Accounting 3 (249)
(2013): 52—59. (In Russian). EDN: PMQBCN.
8. Shavrina Yu. O., Samakaeva M. D. “Evaluating
the Effi ciency of Agricultural Organizations
Management in the Period of Bankruptcy on
the Basis of Strategic Accounting Data”. Socium
i vlast’ 2 (76) (2019): 71—81. (In Russian). https://
doi.org/10.22394/1996-0522-2019-2-71-81

doi: 10.24151/2409-1073-2023-1-6-14

Abstract. The most relevant trends in the modern world economic evolution are considered,
including shifts in the dynamics of gross product production at the global, regional and country
levels, and, in addition, changes in the sphere of international trade against the background of
increasing general turbulence. The article presents a comparative study of the latest changes in
these areas that emerged during the recovery period after the global crisis shocks, manifested
in the context of the cosmopolitan diff usion of viral infection, and then the subsequent ad option
of adequate protective measures in many countries of the world, that is, in 2021—2022.
In the absence of offi cially published fi nal results of the past year, only preliminary estimates
of its results and forecasts of the situation for the current and subsequent years (2023—2024)
are given. Thus, the dynamics of indicators for the four-year period is built, which allows us to
note its most signifi cant characteristics. The author’s analysis is undertaken on the basis of the
methodology of comparative statistical research using recently published offi cial estimates and
forecast data, actually introduced into Russian scientifi c circulation for the fi rst time.

Keywords: world economic dynamics, recovery period, international trade, foreign trade,
merchandise exports, merchandise imports, trade turnover, turbulence, sanctions, China, USA,
European Union, Euro Area, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Japan, Canada, United Kingdom,
Russian Federation

For citation: Gladkov I. S. “World Economy: Trends at the Stage of Increasing Turbulence”.
Economic and Social Research 1 (37) (2023): 6—14. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24151/2409-
1073-2023-1-6-14

References
1. Gladkov I. S. “Foreign Trade Relations of
the European Union: Transformations in the
First 20 Years of the XXI Century (2001—
2020)”. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’no-gumanitarnyye
issledovaniya = Economic and Social
Research 3 (31) (2021): 17—30. (In Russian).
https://doi.org/10.24151/2409-1073-2021-3-
17-30
2. Gladkov I. S. “Foreign Trade of the Russian
Federation and Sanctions: Preliminary Results”.
Mezdunarodnaa zizn’ 5 (2015): 112—130.
(In Russian). EDN: UKKAOZ.
3. Gladkov I. S. “International Trade: Key Trends
for the First 20 Years of the XXI Century
(2001—2020)”. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nogumanitarnyye
issledovaniya = Economic and Social
Research 2 (30) (2021): 16—27. (In Russian).
https://doi.org/10.24151/2409-1073-2021-2-
16-27
4. Gladkov I. S. “World Production and International
Trade: Correlation Dynamics,
Estimates, Forecasts (2020—2022)”.
Tamozhennoye regulirovaniye. Tamozhennyy
kontrol’ 2 (2022): 4—11. (In Russian). EDN:
UWECLW.
5. Gladkov I. S. “Global Economic Dynamics
2020—2022: Slower Recovery, Growing Uncertainty”.
Tamozhennoye regulirovaniye. Tamozhennyy
kontrol’ 1 (2022): 4—11. (In Russian). EDN:
RSNXDD.
6. Federal Customs Service of Russia. N. d. Web.
20 May 2022. <https://eng.customs.gov.ru>.
7. Statistics. UNCTAD. N. d. Web. 20 May 2022.
<https://unctad.org/statistics>.
8. International Monetary Fund. World Economic
Outlook (WEO): Managing Divergent Recoveries.
April 2021. Washington, DC: IMF Publ. Services,
2021. 170 p.
9. International Monetary Fund. World Economic
Outlook (WEO): Recovery during
a Pandemic. Health Concerns, Supply Disruptions,
and Price Pressures. October 2021.
Washington, DC: IMF Publ. Services, 2021.
152 p.
10. International Monetary Fund. World Economic
Outlook (WEO): Countering the Cost-of-Living
Crisis. October 2022. Washington, DC: IMF
Publ. Services, 2022. 166 p.
11. International Monetary Fund. World Economic
Outlook (WEO) Update: Infl ation Peaking amid
Low Growth. January 2023. Washington, DC:
IMF Publ. Services, 2023. 10 p.