The authors consider philosophical aspect of historical studies, exposing basic groups of historical science problems. They did show philosophical interpretation of history by an example of new approach to historical evidences analysis. The authors did compare existing kinds of historical evidences evaluation, have explained the characteristics of their similarity and the contents of positions classifying their dissimilarities, affirming the necessity and significance of historical process’ socio philosophical analysis.
Keywords: history; historical process; historical evidence; socio philosophical analysis.
References
- Kukartseva M. A., Kolomiets E. N. Ontologicheskaya model’ filosofii istorii: problema formirovaniya (Ontology-Based Model of Philosophy of History: Formation Problem), Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, Seriya 7, Filosofiya, 1998, No. 4, pp. 33—41.
- Semenov Yu. I. Filosofiya istorii. (Obshchaya teoriya, osnovnye problemy, idei i kontseptsii ot drevnosti do nashikh dnei.) (Philosophy of History. (General Theory, Points of Concern, Ideas and Concepts from Ancient Times to Present Day.)), M., Sovremennye tetradi, 2003, 776 p.
- Smolenskii N. I. Teoriya i metodologiya istorii (Theory and Methodology of History), 2-e izd., M., Akademiya, 2008, 272 p.
- Drozdov B. V. “O slome otsenok i predstavlenii (Otsenka tataro-mongol’skogo nashestviya na Rus’)” (On Dismantlement of Evaluations and Perceptions (Evaluation of Mongol-Tatar Invasion of Rus)). REMA, Nauchno-obrazovatel’nyi sait. N. p., n. d. Web. 1 March 2017. <http://rema44.ru/about/persons/drozdov/papers/tatari1.html>.