The author performs comparative analysis of basic post-industrial society features and classic utopias. Their resemblance indicates the risk of post-industrial society theory utopization similar to the utopization of socialistic ideal in Russian pre-Revolution intellectuals mind. In addition the author analyses the connection of post-industrialism and globalism ideas and their utopism.
Keywords: post-industrial society; utopia; globalization; future; development.
References
- Pereslegin S. B. Novye karty budushchego, ili Anti-Rend (New Maps of the Future, or Anti-Rand), M., AST, AST Moskva, SPb., Terra Fantastica, 2009, 701 p.
- Inozemtsev V. L. Sobstvennost’ v postindustrial’nom obshchestve i istoricheskoi retrospektive (Property in Post-Industrial Society and Historical Retrospective), Voprosy filosofii, 2000, No. 12, pp. 3—14.
- Inozemtsev V. L. Sovremennoe postindustrial’noe obshchestvo: priroda, protivorechiya, perspektivy (Modern Post-Industrial Society: Nature, Contradictions, and Prospects), M., Logos, 2000, 186 p.
- Toffler E. Tret’ya volna (Third Wave), M., AST, 2004, 781 p.
- Nikonov A. P. Sud’ba tsivilizatora. Teoriya i praktika gibeli imperii (Civilizator’s Fate. Theory and Practice of Empires’ Ruin), M., Izd-vo NTs ENAS, 2006, 256 p.
- Avrelii Avgustin. O Grade Bozhiem (The City of God), Mn., Kharvest, M., AST, 2000, 1296 p.