The authors connect the administrative power of State that became the most effective corporate governance subject in modern Russia, among other things, to powers and authority concentration in the hands of administrative elite. They focus on accompanying processes, namely democratic transit suspension and political spectrum narrowing. The authors stressed out the necessity for the State to comprehend these processes as the country’s political security threat. They have called the political spectrum width optimization one of political security imperatives for modern Russian society.

Keywords: political party effectiveness; administrative elite; authoritarian bureaucracy restoration; party of government; country’s political spectrum.

References

1. Rastimeshina T. V. Kul’turnoe nasledie Tserkvi v prezentatsii velikoderzhavnoi modeli istorii i obraza “narodnoi monarkhii” v sovremennoi Rossii (The Church’s Cultural Heritage in the History’s Great-Power Model and “the People’s Monarchy” Image Presentation in Modern Russia), Vestnik MGADA, Seriya Filosofskie, sotsial’nye i estestvennye nauki, 2012, No. 5 (17), pp. 76—85.
2. Sulakshin S. S. Politicheskaya i partiinaya sistema Rossii i gosudarstvennoe upravlenie (Russia’s Political and Party System and State Administration), Problemnyi analiz i gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskoe proektirovanie, 2010, T. 3, No. 1, pp. 85—103.
3. Politicheskaya i partiinaya sistema sovremennoi Rossii (Modern Russia’s Political and Party System), mat-ly Vseross. nauch. konf., 2 okt. 2009 g., Moskva, Tsentr probl. anal. i gos.-upr. proekt., M., Nauchnyi ekspert, 2009, 368 p.
4. Shabrov O. F. Mesto izbrannykh: Korporativnye interesy predstavleny v politicheskoi vlasti luchshe vsego (Position for the Elect: Corporate Interests Have the Best Presentation in Political Power), Nezavisimaya gazeta, pril. NG-Politika, 2008, 16 dek., No. 273 (4509).
5. Povestka dnya dlya Rossii: mat-ly kruglykh stolov fonda “Edinstvo vo imya Rossii” za 2003 g. (Agenda for Russia: “Unity in the Name of Russia” Foundation’s Round-Table Conferences Papers, 2003), Pod red. V. A. Nikonova, M., Forum, 2004, 588 p.
6. Karapetyan L. M. Politicheskie partii v sud’be Rossii (Political Parties in Russia’s Destiny), SPb., Izd-vo R. Aslanova “Yuridicheskii tsentr Press”, 2009, 264 p., Konstitutsionnoe, munitsipal’noe i administrativnoe pravo.
7. Bartsits I. N. Reforma gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v Rossii: pravovoi aspect (State Administration Reform in Russia: Legal Aspect), M., Formula prava, 2007, 508 p.
8. Kuzyk B. N. Rossiya i mir v XXI veke (Russia and the World in 21st Century), M., In-t ekonomicheskikh strategii, 2006, 639 p.
9. Gosudarstvennaya politika vyvoda Rossii iz demograficheskogo krizisa (Government Policy to Overcome the Demographic Crisis in Russia), V. I. Yakunin, S. S. Sulakshin, V. E. Bagdasaryan i dr., 2-e izd., M., Nauchnyi ekspert, 2007, 888 p.
10. Gosudarstvennaya ekonomicheskaya politika i ekonomicheskaya doktrina Rossii. K umnoi i nravstvennoi ekonomike, v 5 t. (Government Economic Policy and Russia’s Economic Doctrine. Towards Smart and Moral Economy, in 5 Vols.), V. I. Yakunin, V. L. Makarov, S. S. Sulakshin i dr., M., Nauchnyi ekspert, 2008.
11. Variativnost’ i tsiklichnost’ global’nogo sotsial’nogo razvitiya chelovechestva (Humanity’s Social Development’s Variability and Cyclicity), monografiya, V. I. Yakunin, V. E. Bagdasaryan, V. I. Kulikov, S. S. Sulakshin, M., Nauchnyi ekspert, 2009, 464 p.
12. Dyuverzhe M. Politicheskie partii (Political Parties), Per. s fr., M., Akademicheskii proekt, 2000, 558 p., Kontseptsii.
13. Golosov G. V. Partiinye sistemy Rossii i stran Vostochnoi Evropy (Party Systems in Russia and Eastern European Countries), M., Ves’ mir, 1999, 152 p.
14. Ledyaev V. G. Vlast’, avtoritet i gospodstvo v Rossii: osnovnye kharakteristiki i formy (Power, Authority and Rule in Russia: Basic Parameters and Forms), Politicheskaya kontseptologiya, 2009, No. 4, pp. 61—94.
15. Isakov A. L. “Model’ arkhaizatsii politicheskogo protsessa na materialakh postsovetstkoi politicheskoi empiriki” (Political Process Archaization Model as Exemplified in Post-Soviet Political Empirics). Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya 12 (2013): n. pag. Web. 18 Sept. 2015.
    <http://teoria-practica.ru/rus/files/arhiv_zhurnala/2013/12/politika/isakov.pdf>
16. Vasil’ev V. I. “Vertikal’ ” i “gorizontal’ ”. Pravovye voprosy organizatsii vlasti (‘Vertical’ and ‘Horizontal’. Power Organization’s Legal Matters), [sb. st.], M., Yurist, 2006, 363 p., Res cottidiana.
17. Golovchenko V. I. Partiino-ideologicheskii faktor politicheskoi transformatsii sovremennoi Rossii (Modern Russia’s Political Transformation’s Party and Ideological Factor), Pod red. A. A. Vilkova, M., Nauka, 2009, 236 p.
18. Zotova Z. M. Politicheskie partii i izbiratel’nyi protsess (Political Parties and Electoral Process), M., RTsOIT, 2002, 176 p., Sovremennye izbiratel’nye tekhnologii.
19. Gryzlov B. V. Politicheskie partii i rossiiskie transformatsii: teoriya i politicheskaya praktika, avtoref. dis. … kand. polit. nauk (Political Parties and Russia’s Transformations: Theory and Political Practice, Law PhD Thesis Synopsis), SPb., 2001, 20 p.