Continuing the knowledge’s social legitimation problem’s study, the author proceeds from the necessity to explore the object’s symbolic objectification problem by applying the notion of “phase” that he introduced and substantiated on content-related and formal levels in his previous works. In cognitions objectification’s key stages’ further consideration the author applies his original methodology to reveal the very core of modern cognitive science. Main conclusions about cognitive synthesis’ prerequisites’ content were made in paper’s end and supported by compelling
examples from modern physics.
Keywords: existence hypotheses; intellection forms; cognitive synthesis; transcendental idealism; apriorism; phase; symbolism; authomorphism.
References
- Il’in V. V. Filosofiya istorii (Philosophy of History), monografiya, M., Izd-vo MGU, 2003, 380 p., il.
- Leibnits G.-V. Sochineniya (Works), v 4 t., T. 3, M., Mysl’, 1984, 734 p., Filosofskoe nasledie.
- Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma (The Critique of Pure Reason), M., EKSMO, 2007, 736 p., Antologiya mysli.
- Mandel’shtam L. I. Polnoe sobranie trudov (Complete Works), T. 4, Lektsii po kolebaniyam. 1930—1932 gg. (Lectures on Oscillations, 1930 to 1932), M., Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1955, 512 p.
- Chupakhin I. Ya., Fatiev N. I. Sovremennaya modal’naya semantika i kategoriya sushchnosti (Contemporary Modal Semantics and the Notion of Essence), Vestnik Leningradskogo universiteta, Seriya Ekonomika. Filosofiya. Pravo, 1981, Vyp. 2, No. 11, pp. 100—104.
- Marks K. K kritike gegelevskoi filosofii prava // Sochineniya / K. Marks, F. Engel’s. 2-e izd. T. 1. M.: Politizdat, 1955. S. 219—368.
- Laue M. Istoriya fiziki (History of Physics), M., Gostekhizdat, 1956, 230 p.
- Engel’s F. Pis’ma k raznym litsam (yanvar’ 1893 — iyul’ 1895) (Letters to Various Persons (January 1893 to July 1895)), Sochineniya by K. Marks, F. Engel’s. 2-e izd, T. 39, M., Politizdat, 1966, pp. 3—414.
- Lyubimov N. A. Iz knigi illyuzii, tain, chudes, otkrytii, dikovinok, kur’ezov, predrassudkov, zabluzhdenii, mechtanii, neveroyatnostei i nevozmozhnostei (From the Book of Illusions, Secrets, Wonders, Discoveries, Gimmicks, Curiosities, Prejudices, Aberrations, Musings, Improbabilities, and Impossibilities), SPb., Tip. V. V. Komarova, 1888, 4, 72 p.
- Zaitsev G. A. Abstraktnye skhemy fiziki i teoriya fizicheskikh teorii. I (Physics’ Abstract Schemes and Theory of Physical Theories. I), Filosofiya i fizika, Voronezh, Izd-vo VGU, 1972, Vyp. 150, pp. 5—19.
- Libsher D.-E. Teoriya otnositel’nosti s tsirkulem i lineikoi (Relativity Theory with Compasses and Ruler), Per. s nem. V. E. Markevicha pod red. N. V. Mitskevicha, M., Mir, 1980, 149 p., ris.
- Feinberg E. L. Dve kul’tury: intuitsiya i logika v iskusstve i nauke (Two Cultures: Intuition and Logic in Arts and Science), M., Nauka, 1992, 255 p.