The author did study the concepts of discursive and narrative analysis and did find the similarities between discursive and narrative that enable to use them in consistent unity under forensic psychological enquiry. Within the analysis of revealing the reliability-unreliability signs in evidences of a person under examination the author has discovered the possibility to use discursive and narrative analysis within the structure of audiovisual data psychological analysis under forensic examination. She also explained and justified the questions a psychological expert can answer using discursive and narrative analysis within the frames of forensic psychological enquiry.

Keywords: discursive analysis; narrative analysis; forensic psychological enquiry.

References

1. Khabalev V. D., Khaidov S. K. Mesto kongruentnosti v sudebno-psikhologicheskoi ekspertize (Congruence Place in Forensic Psychological Enquiry), Put’ nauki, 2015, No. 10 (20), pp. 100—101.
2. Khaidov S. K. Diskursivnyi analiz v sudebno-psikhologicheskoi ekspertize pri issledovanii audiovideofailov (Discursive Analysis in Legal Psychological Enquiry at Audio and Video Files Studying), Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’no-gumanitarnye issledovaniya, 2015, No. 1 (5), pp. 102—104.
3. Khaidov S. K., Apal’kova E. V. Primenenie narrativnogo analiza v sudebno-psikhologicheskoi ekspertize pri analize audiovideofailov (Narrative Analysis Application in Forensic Psychological Examination at Audio and Video Files Studying), Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’no-gumanitarnye issledovaniya, 2015, No. 3 (7), pp. 78—80.
4. Kadyrova R. G. Teoriya narrativa i narrativnyi analiz v psikhologii (The Theory of Narrative and Narrative Analysis in Psychology), Vektor nauki TGU, Seriya Pedagogika, psikhologiya, 2012, No. 2 (9), pp. 126—127.
5. Trotsuk I. V. Teoriya i praktika narrativnogo analiza v sotsiologii (Theory and Practice of Narrative Analysis in Psychology), monografiya, M., Unikum-tsentr, 2006, 207 p.
6. Engalychev V. F., Yunda A. V. Problemy vyyavleniya nedostovernykh i lozhnykh soobshchenii v ekspertnoi besede (Problems of Revealing Unreliable and False Statement in Expert Interview), Aktual’noe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya sudebnoi psikhologii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii, mat-ly Vseross. nauch.-prakt. konf. s mezhdunar. uchastiem (g. Kaluga, 26—29 maya 2010 g.), Kaluga, Izd-vo KGU im. K. E. Tsiolkovskogo, 2010, pp. 138—144.
7. Leont’ev A. A., Shakhnarovich A. M., Batov V. I. Rech’ v kriminalistike i sudebnoi psikhologii (Speech in Criminal Science and Forensic Psychology), M., Nauka, 1977, 62 p.
8. Apal’kova E. V., Khaidov S. K. Struktura psikhologicheskogo analiza audiovideozapisi v sudebnoi ekspertize (Audio and Video Recordings’ Psychological Analysis Structure in Forensic Enquiry), Materialy regional’noi universitetskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (18—22 fevralya 2013 g.), Kaluga, Izd-vo KGU im. K. E. Tsiolkovskogo, 2013, pp. 248—250, Nauchnye trudy Kaluzhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. K. E. Tsiolkovskogo, Seriya Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie nauki.
9. Khaidov S. K. Mesto kongruentnosti v sudebno-psikhologicheskoi ekspertize (Congruence Place in Forensic Psychological Enquiry), Materialy regional’noi universitetskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (18—22 fevralya 2013 g.), Kaluga, Izd-vo KGU im. K. E. Tsiolkovskogo, 2013, pp. 294—296, Nauchnye trudy Kaluzhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. K. E. Tsiolkovskogo, Seriya Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie nauki.
10. Engalychev V. F., Moiseeva I. G. K voprosu otsenki zaklyucheniya sudebno-psikhologicheskoi ekspertizy (Towards the Forensic Report Valuation), Obvinenie i zashchita po ugolovnym delam: istoricheskii opyt i sovremennost’, sb. statei po mat-lam Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., posvyashch. 100-letiyu so dnya rozhd. prof. N. S. Alekseeva, Pod red. N. G. Stoiko, SPb., SPbGU, 2015, pp. 559—565.
11. Sudebnaya ekspertiza: tipichnye oshibki (Forensic Enquiry: Typical Mistakes), Pod red. E. R. Rossinskoi, M., Prospekt, 2013, 544 p.
12. Chizhova D. S. Osobennosti sudebno-psikhologicheskoi ekspertizy psikhologicheskikh vozdeistvii po ugolovnym delam, avtoref. dis. … kand. psikhol. nauk (Peculiarities of Forensic Psychological Enquiry of Psychological Effects at Criminal Proceedings, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Psychol.) Dissertation), SPb., Kaluga, 2003, 21 p.
13. Moiseeva T. F. Tipichnye oshibki pri naznachenii, proizvodstve sudebnoi ekspertizy i otsenke ee rezul’tatov (Typical Mistakes at Forensic Enquiry Commissioning, Performance, and its Report Valuation), Ugolovnyi protsess, 2013, No. 3, pp. 10—17.