The authors did a survey of philosophical and historical thought development stages. They cleared up the specificity of historical process’ socio-philosophical comprehension and presented a range of positions that reason the necessity and relevance of history’s socio-philosophical analysis use. The authors have denoted the following sections of scientific approaches: ontological, epistemological, methodological, methodic, ideological, culturological, humanistic, political, historical, and socio-practical.

Keywords: history analysis; socio-philosophical approach; positions-sections; philosophical and historical thought; philosophical methodology; historical knowledge.

References

1. Semenov Yu. I. Filosofiya istorii: (Obshchaya teoriya, osnovnye problemy, idei i kontseptsii ot drevnosti do nashikh dnei) (Philosophy of History (General Theory, Main Problems, Ideas and Concepts from Ancient Times to Present Days)), M., Sovremennye tetradi, 2003, 775 p., Nauchnaya biblioteka “Sovremennykh tetradei”, Filosofiya.
2. Il’in V. V. Filosofiya istorii (Philosophy of History), M., Izd-vo MGU, 2003, 380 p., il.
3. Malinov A. V., Prokhorenko A. V. Filosofiya istorii v Rossii (Philosophy of History in Russia), M., Evropeiskii Dom, 2010, 256 p.
4. Koval’chenko I. D. Metody istoricheskogo issledovaniya (Methods of Historical Research), monografiya, 2-e izd., dop., M., Nauka, 2003, 486 p., il.
5. Smolenskii N. I. Istoriya i logika: problemy obshcheistoricheskoi teorii i prirody istoricheskikh ponyatii (History and Logic: Problems of General Historical Theory and of Historical Notions’ Nature), M., Izd-vo MGOU, 2013, 183 p.
6. Lavrinenko V. N. Dialektika istoricheskogo protsessa (Dialectics of Historical Process), Filosofiya, by G. I. Ikonnikova, V. N. Lavrinenko, V. P. Ratnikov i dr., 2-e izd., ispr., M., Yurist, 1998, pp. 399—413, Institutiones.
7. Mezhuev V. M. Filosofiya istorii i istoricheskaya nauka (Philosophy of History and Historical Science), Voprosy filosofii, 1994, No. 4, pp. 74—86.
8. Rubtsov A. V. “Struktura istoricheskogo protsessa i sloi real’nosti” (Historical Process’ Structure and Reality Layer). Institut filosofii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. IF RAN, 2011. Web. 09 June 2017. <http://iphras.ru/uplfile/ideol/roubcov/2011/Polignosis_1.html#_ftn1>.
9. Gurevich A. Ya. Chto takoe istoricheskii fakt? (What is Historical Evidence?), Istochnikovedenie. Teoreticheskie i metodicheskie problemy, M., Nauka, 1969, pp. 71—88.
10. Kukartseva M. A., Kolomoets E. N. Ontologicheskaya model’ filosofii istorii: problema formirovaniya (Ontological Model of Philosophy of History: Formation Problem), Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, Seriya 7 Filosofiya, 1998, No. 4, pp. 33—41.
11. Milov L. V. Osobennosti istoricheskogo protsessa v Rossii (Peculiarities of Historical Process in Russia), Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, 2003, T. 73 No. 9, pp. 771—778.
12. Barg M. A. Kategorii i metody istoricheskoi nauki (Categories and Methods of Historical Science), M., Nauka, 1984, 342 p., il.
13. Dobriyanov V. S. Metodologicheskie problemy teoreticheskogo i istoricheskogo poznaniya (Methodological Problems of Theoretical and Historical Knowledge), M., Mysl’, 1968, 318 p., il., tabl.
14. Lanin N. N. Filosofskii analiz istorii Rossii — SSSR — SNG kak chasti mirovoi istorii (Philosophical Analysis of Russian — Soviet — CIS History as Part of World History), 2-e izd., Pavlodar, EKO, 2002, 412 p.
15. Kamenskii Z. A. Metodologiya istoriko-filosofskogo issledovaniya (Methodology of Historical and Philosophic Research), M., IF RAN, 2002, 371 p., portr.

https://doi.org/10.24151/2409-1073-2017-2-49-54