The aauthors did present the principal interpretation of the definition of “social capital”. Key elements of this category were considered from the point of view of social and spiritual approaches. Social capital of National Research Mordovia State University was analyzed. Possible areas for improvement and development were identified.

Keywords: social capital; regulations and beliefs; communication; portfolio of organizational values.

References

1. Fukuyama F. Doverie: sotsial’nye dobrodeteli i put’ k protsvetaniyu (Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity), per. s angl., M., ACT, Ermak, 2004, 730 p.
2. Sotsial’nyi kapital lichnosti (Social Capital of a Personality), monografiya, by L. G. Pochebut, A. L. Sventsitskii, L. V. Mararitsa, T. V. Kazantseva, M., NITs INFRA-M, 2014, 250 p.
3. Kameron K. Diagnostika i izmenenie organizatsionnoi kul’tury (Corporate Culture Diagnosis and Change), per. s angl., Pod red. I. V. Andreevoi, SPb, Piter, 2001, 320 p.
4. Lipatov S. A. Oprosnik “Shkaly organizatsionnykh paradigm” L. L. Konstantina (L. L. Konstantin’s Questionnaire “Organizational Paradigms’ Scales”), Zhurnal prakticheskogo psikhologa, 2005, No. 2, pp. 186—198.
5. Masilova M. G. Organizatsionnaya kul’tura vuza: netraditsionnye podkhody k ee vospriyatiyu i izucheniyu (The Organizational Culture of the University: Innovative Approaches to the Perceive and Study), Territoriya novykh vozmozhnostei. Vestnik Vladivostokskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i servisa, 2015, No. 1 (28), pp. 52—57.