The article presents a view of the problem of freedom through the prism of the author’s concept of fractality. The importance of theoretical understanding of the concept of freedom in its foundation is noted; by the example of a series of experiments of Libet it is shown that without such an understanding errors and distortions of interpretative conclusions in solving the problem of freedom are inevitable, which is reflected in a contradiction in the worldview position of man as a free being. The article establishes connection between logical problems and ways of solving contradiction of freedom and necessity. It shows that disregard of monistic logic of wholeness which is represented by Spinoza’s position leads to transformed (fractal) form of freedom — freedom of choice as subjective ability to act independently of external circumstances. The concept of a strange attractor is considered and a conclusion about fractality as the essence of its «strange» nature is made. The connection between fractality and freedom in the being dimension of its development as a universal human definition is shown.
Keywords: freedom, necessity, randomness, fractality, dialectics, monism, Spinoza, transformed form.
References
- Asmus V. F. Dialektika neobhodimosti i svobody v filosofii istorii Gegelja // Voprosy filosofii, 1995, № 1. S. 52—69.
- Bazhanov V. A. Kvantovo-mehanicheskij podhod k probleme soznanija // Materija i soznanie. M.: INION AN SSSR, 1985. S. 139—152.
- Bosenko V. A. Vseobshhaja teorija razvitija. Kiev, 2001. 468 s.
- Vojcehovich V.Je. Sinergeticheskaja koncepcija fraktalov // Sinergeticheskaja paradigma: chelovek i obshhestvo v uslovijah nestabil’nosti. M.: Progress-Tradicija, 2003. S. 141—156.
- Gegel’ G.V.F. Nauka logiki. T. 2. M.: Socjekgiz, 1939. 388 s.
- Demenok S. L. Prosto fraktal. SPb.: Strata, 2019. 274 s.
- Lazutkin V. A. V zashhitu sinergetiki i dialektiki ot okolonauchnyh maroderov i v zashhitu gumanizma // Dialektika i problemy razvitija nauki: monografija: v 2 ch. / Pod obshh. red. dokt. filos. nauk, akademika Akmeologicheskoj akademii Gusevoj N.V. Ch. 1. Ust’-Kamenogorsk, 2017. S. 125—150.
- Lobastov G. V. Dialektika razumnoj formy i fenomenologija bezumija. M.: Russkaja panorama, 2012. 560 s.
- Rassel B. Istorija zapadnoj filosofii: v 2 t. T. 2. M.: Mif, 1993. 509 s.
- Samarskij A. Ju. O vzaimootnoshenii sinergetiki i dialektiki // Nash Il’enkov: Uchit’sja myslit’ smolodu / Pod red. V. D. Pihorovicha. M.: LENAND, 2016. S. 54—57.
- Simonova S. A. K probleme jetiko-jesteticheskogo sinteza // Vestnik VGU. Serija: Filosofija. 2011. № 2. S. 85—93.
- Suhanov V. N. Filosofija v obrazovatel’nopedagogicheskom processe: monografija / Pod. obshh. red. N. V. Gusevoj. Ust’-Kamenogorsk, 2016. 180 s.
- Fromm Je. Begstvo ot svobody. M.: AST, 2019. 288 s.
- Hajtun S. D. Ot jergodicheskoj gipotezy k fraktal’noj kartine mira: Rozhdenie i osmyslenie novoj paradigmy. M.: LENAND, 2016. 256 s.
- Chalmers D. Soznajushhij um. V poiskah fundamental’noj teorii soznanija. M.: Editorial URSS: LIBROKOM, 2013. 512 s.
- Jengel’s F. Dialektika prirody. M.: OGIZ; Gospolitizdat, 1941. 338 s.
- Dennett D. C. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1991. 528 p.
- Herrmann S. S., Pauen M., Min V. K., Busch N.A., Rieger J. W. Eine neue Interpretation von Libets Experimeuten aus der Aualyse einer Wahlreaktioiisaufgabe // Bewusstsein. Philosophie, Neu-rowisseitschaften, Ethik, hrsg. v. C. S. Hermann, M. Pauen, J. W. Rieger und S. Schicktanz. Paderborn, 2005. R. 120—134.
- Marks-Tarlow T. The Self as a Dynamical System // Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, Vol. 3, №. 4, 1999. R. 311—345.
- Mele A. R. Free: Why Science Hasn’t Disproved Free Will (angl.). Oxford University Press, 2014. 112 p.