From the standpoint of social philosophy, the authors consider the mutual influence of science and public opinion as institutions of the spiritual sphere. The second part of the study analyzes the features of the institutionalization of public opinion. The evolution of views on public opinion is traced. The structure of public opinion is graphically presented. Its essential characteristics and possible options for the significance of this institution for society are revealed. Guided by the works of classics and modern researchers, the authors demonstrated the influence of public opinion on the institution of science, which made it possible to establish the nationally marked features of Russian scientific reality.
Science and public opinion as spiritual sphere institutions: socio-philosophical analysis. Part 2
Written by Nikita Nikolayevich Ravochkin, Vladimir Petrovich Shchennikov
Keywords: science, institution, society, spiritual sphere, public opinion, values, interactions..
References
- Bourdieu P. Sotsiologiya politiki. M.: SocioLogos, 1993. 336 s.
- Vakulenko A. S. Obshhestvennoe mnenie v social’no-istoricheskom processe: avtoref. diss. kand. filos. nauk: 09.00.11. Krasnodar, 2014. 23 s.
- VTsIOM predstavlyaet dannye oprosa rossiyan o sovremennoi nauke [Elektronnyi resurs]. 19 maya 2021 g. // VTsIOM: [sait]. URL: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/nauchpop-v-trende (data obrashcheniya 17.05.2022).
- Gegel’ G. V. F. Filosofiya prava. M.: Mysl’, 1990. 524 s.
- Gol’tsendorf F. Rol’ obshchestvennogo mneniya v gosudarstvennoi zhizni. SPb.: F. Pavlenkov, 1881. 139 s.
- Gorobets B. S. Krug Landau. Zhizn’ geniya. M.: Izd-vo LKI, 2008. 361 s.
- Koval’ T. B. Etika truda pravoslaviya // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. 1994. № 6. S. 55—70.
- Konnov V. I. Vliyanie kul’turnogo konteksta na razvitie nauki v Rossii: sotsial’no-psikhologicheskii vzglyad // Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta. 2012. № 6 (27). S. 242—249.
- Lippman U. Obshchestvennoe mnenie. M.: Institut Fonda «Obshchestvennoe mnenie», 2004. 384 s.
- Luman N. Real’nost’ mass-media. M.: Praksis, 2005. 256 s.
- Merton R. Sotsial’naya teoriya i sotsial’naya struktura. M.: AST, 2006. 873 s.
- Nesevrya N. A. Institutsionalizatsiya obshchestvennogo mneniya v transformiruyushchemsya rossiiskom obshchestve: regional’nyi aspekt: avtoref. diss. kand. sots. nauk: 22.00.04. Perm’, 2006. 28 s.
- Podruchnyi M.V. Obshchestvennoe mnenie kak sotsial’nyi institut // Trudy Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. Seriya 6: Istoriya, filosofiya. 2020. № 2(239). S. 115—118.
- Romanovich N. A. Sovremennyi uchenyi v zerkale obshchestvennogo mneniya // Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologii. 2010. T. 1, № 3. S. 58—66.
- Sinchuk Yu.V. [i dr.] Obshchestvennoe mnenie kak institut grazhdanskogo obshchestva / Yu.V. Sinchuk, B.F. Solov’ev, B. E. Vlasov // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Obshchestvennye nauki. 2020. № 3(840). S. 162—170.
- Tard G. Obshchestvennoe mnenie i tolpa. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN; KSP+, 1998. 416 s.
- Uspenskii B.A. Russkaya intelligentsiya kak spetsificheskii fenomen russkoi kul’tury // Russkaya intelligentsiya i zapadnyi intellektualizm: istoriya i tipologiya. M.: OGI, 1999. 152 s.
- Khvostov V.M. Obshchestvennoe mnenie i politicheskie partii. M.: t-vo I.D. Sytina, 1906. 63 s.
- Tsygankov A. Tramp i krizis oligarkhii [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://ru.valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/tramp-i-krizis-oligarkhii/ (data obrashcheniya 17.05.2022).
- Yurevich A.V., Tsapenko I.P. Nuzhny li Rossii uchenye? M.: Editorial URSS, 2001. 198 s.
- Yaroshevskii M.G. Shkoly v nauke // Psikhologiya nauki. M.: Flinta, 1998. 310 s.
- Lowell A. W. Public opinion and popular government. New York, 1926. 415 p.
- Oyserman D. Cultural psychology: a new look / D. Oyserman, M. Kemmelmeier, H. Coon // Psychological Bulletin. 2002. Vol. 128, № 1. R. 110—117.