Personal security in the Internet space: establishing and protecting new boundaries of privacy
Written by N. N. SamokhinaAbstract. The problem of boundaries detecting and individual private space protecting in
the Internet is considered. In this work, the judgment is substantiated that total penetration of
Internet technologies into public life and relationships increases the impact of various risk factors
on the sphere of confi dentiality and privacy of a person, which leads to the evolution of the
very concept of privacy. It is suggested that understanding the evolution of the sphere of privacy
in a digital society is crucial for understanding the problem of protecting a person’s personal
boundaries. The necessity of fi nding a balance between the individual human right to privacy
and the public demand for the protection of this right is shown. An assumption has been made
about the possible eff ectiveness of the application of I. Altman’s theory describing the process
of establishing the boundaries of confi dentiality at the level of individual behavior to regulate the
sphere of personal security protection in the Internet space.
Keywords: Internet space, digital society, personal security, confi dentiality, privacy, personal
data
For citation: Samokhina N. N. “Personal Security in the Internet Space: Establishing and
Protecting New Boundaries of Privacy”. Economic and Social Research 1 (37) (2023): 148—154. (In
Russian). https://doi.org/10.24151/2409-1073-2023-1-148-154
References
1. “Personal Information Culture: Concept and
Content”. Protivodeystviye ideyam ekstremizma
i terrorizma v seti Internet: mezhdistsiplinarnyy
analiz, joint monograph. Gen. ed. A. A. Litsuk.
Nizhnevartovsk: Nizhnevartovsk State Univ.
Publ., 2017. Par. 1. 37—44. (In Russian). EDN:
ZKJUTV.
2. Samygin S. I., Vereshchagina A. V. “Global
Challenges of the Present and Safety of the Civilization
of the Third Millennium”. European Social
Science Journal 6-2 (45) (2014): 60—66. (In
Russian). EDN: TIGROP.
3. Altman Irwin. The Environment and Social Behavior:
Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, Crowding.
Salt Lake City: Brooks/Cole Publ., 1975.
256 р.
4. Neethling J. “The Concept of Privacy in South
African Law: Notes”. South African Law Journal
122.1 (2005): 18—28.
Philosophical foundations of collective practices of modernity
Written by N. N. Ravochkindoi: 10.24151/2409-1073-2023-1-140-147
Abstract. From a philosophical perspective, the author looks at the foundations of collective
practices in the modern world and analyses the specifi cs of the new, global level of problems in social
being. The author emphasizes the role of constructivist methodology in transforming objects
of state architectonics and in addition substantiates the signifi cance of the concepts of dialogism,
relativism and pragmatism as applied to forms of self-organization. The analysis has identifi ed
points of growth for addressing a wide range of issues in social practice. Finally, the link between
consolidation of eff orts and resources have been outlined.
Keywords: collective practices, consolidation, dialogism, constructivism, relativism, pragmatism,
resources, intelligence, social being, world order, methodology
For citation: Ravochkin N. N. “Philosophical Foundations of Collective Practices of Modernity”.
Economic and Social Research 1 (37) (2023): 140—147. (In Russian). https://doi.
org/10.24151/2409-1073-2023-1-140-147
References
1. Alexeyeva Tatiana A. “Think Like Constructivist:
Discovering a Polyphonic World”.
Sravnitel’naya politika = Comparative Politics
Russia 5.1 (2014): 4—21. (In Russian). EDN:
RTZSOV.
2. Gordeev I. “Specific Features of the Global
Policy in the Post-Modern Era”. Vlast’ = The
Authority 3 (2008): 79—82. (In Russian). EDN:
KARAKH.
3. Grebenyuk A. A. “Information and Psychological
Security and Simulacrization of Science in
a Modern Transitive Society”. Chelovek — Priroda
— Obshchestvo: Teoriya i praktika bezopasnosti
zhiznedeyatel’nosti, ekologii i valeologii 6 (13)
(2020):15—21. (In Russian). EDN: BLKUYW.
4. Dzhokhadze Igor. “Pragmatism and War”. Istoriya
fi losofi i = History of Philosophy 20.1 (2015):
193—214. (In Russian). EDN: VUCBKP.
5. Kazantsev A. A. “ ‘Constructivist Revolution’,
or About the Role of Cultural and Civilizational
Factors in the Modern Theory of International
Relations”. Politicheskaya nauka = Political
Science (RU) 4 (2009): 88—114. (In Russian).
EDN: KXOWUZ.
6. Kosarev A. V., Volf M. N. “Joseph Margolis’s
Neo-Pragmatism”. Idei i idealy = Ideas and Ideals
2.2 (32) (2017): 3—16. (In Russian). https://
doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2017-2.2-3-16
7. Kochergin Albert N. “The Role of Dialogism
Concept in the Civilization’s Fortune
(M. M. Bakhtin, M. Buber, K. Jaspers)”. Gumanitariy:
aktual’nyye problemy gumanitarnoy
nauki i obrazovaniya = Russian Journal of the
Humanities 2 (38) (2017): 45—52. (In Russian).
EDN: ZIGAYB.
8. Lantsov S. A. “The Carribean Missile Crisis in
International Relations of the XXth Century:
Theoretical and Practical-Political Aspects”.
Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS = Political
Expertise: POLITEX 9.2 (2013): 131—136. (In
Russian). EDN: RTDBCR.
9. Ravochkin Nikita N., Knyazev Nikolai A.,
Kruglova Inna N., Leopa Aleksandr V.,
Shtumpf Svetlana P. “The Problem of Ideas
in the Context of Social Constructivism”.
Kontekst i refl eksiya: fi losofi ya o mire i cheloveke
= Context and Refl ection: Philosophy of
the World and Human Being 9.3A (2020): 148—
157. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.34670/
AR.2020.37.41.017
10. Soboleva M. E. “On Possibility of Dialog Between
Cultures”. Voprosy fi losofi i 3 (2009): 147—
157. (In Russian). EDN: JWLMVJ.
11. Tumanova O. I. “Political Representation and
Representative Democracy in the Philosophy of
F. Ankersmith”. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo
universiteta. Seriya: Filosofi ya = Herald of
Tver State University. Series: Philosophy 1 (59)
(2022): 216—223. (In Russian). https://doi.
org/10.26456/vtphilos/2022.1.216
Managing the process of digitalization of the domestic education system as an urgent social problem
Written by R. R. Kutlovadoi: 10.24151/2409-1073-2023-1-126-131
Abstract. It is noted that in the era of digitalization, information is the main management
resource, but it is characterized by redundancy, multi-aspect, multiplicity of sources and transmission
channels. It is indicated that redundancy and other new properties of information are
key factors in reducing the level of effi ciency of management of various social systems, including
the education system. It is shown that the education system, being heterogeneous and complex,
interacts with many social institutions, which actualizes the problem of increasing the eff ectiveness
of managing the digitalization of education in order to preserve its qualities such as stability and
adaptability to the contingent environment. It has been concluded that the management of digitalization
of education is an actual type of social activity that ensures the convergence of historically
formed stability and constructive transformations of the education system.
Keywords: information, digitalization of education, social activity, management.
For citation: Kutlova R. R. “Managing the Process of Digitalization of the Domestic Education
System as an Urgent Social Problem”. Economic and Social Research 1 (37) (2023): 126—131.
(In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24151/2409-1073-2023-1-126-131
References
1. Wiener N. The Human Use of Human Beings:
Cybernetics and Society. 2nd ed. Boston, MA:
Houghton Miffl in, 1954. 199 p.
2. Castells M. Communication Power. 1st ed. Oxford.:
Oxford University Press, 2009. 571 p.
3. Korableva Ye. V., Muzychenko M. Ya. “Information
Culture as a Factor of Human Identifi cation
in Cyberspace”. Tsivilizatsiya — Obshchestvo
— Chelovek 6-7 (2018): 15—16. (In Russian).
EDN: VBUWWJ.
4. Khlebnikov G. V. “Luciano Floridi’s Philosophy
of Information”. Metafi zika = Metaphysics
4 (10) (2013): 35—48. (In Russian).
5. Shmatkov M. N. “Socio-philosophical aspects
of modeling information processes in educational
systems”. Informatsiya i obrazovaniye: granitsy
kommunikatsiy INFO’09 = Information and
Education: the Boundaries of Communication
INFO’09, collection of scientifi c works. Gorno-
Altaisk: Editorial and publishing department of
GASU, 2009. 98—101. (In Russian).
6. Baeva L. “Digital Education and Personal
Safety”. Proceedings of the 1st International
Conference on Education: Current Issues and
Digital Technologies (ICECIDT 2021), Moscow,
Russia, March 30—31, 2021. N. p.:
Atlantis Press, 2021. 286—292. Vol. 555 of
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities
Research. https://doi.org/10.2991/
assehr.k.210527.004
Drama of “Russian idea” in the circle of Russian history
Written by S. P. Kolpakovadoi: 10.24151/2409-1073-2023-1-120-125
Abstract. The author considers the problem of comprehension of historic trajectory of Russia:
its identifi cation either with East or West or its spin-off into a separate world. The analysis is given
of intellectual debates about destiny of Russia, which start on the cusp of centuries. The author
notes common staging ground for all “Russian idea” retrieval routes: dissatisfaction with current
state of the country. It has been demonstrated that the drama of “Russian idea” is in diversity and
discrepancy of beliefs about place and role of Russia in the world.
Keywords: age of Enlightenment, Russian style, national self-image, self-identity, “Russian
idea”, Occidentalism, Slavophilism, offi cial formula of national spirit, geopolitics, Eurasia, messianship
For citation: Kolpakova S. P. “Drama of ‘Russian Idea’ in the Circle of Russian History”. Economic
and Social Research 1 (37) (2023): 120—125. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24151/2409-
1073-2023-1-120-125
References
1. Berezovaya L. G. “Search and Variants of
National Idea in the Intellectual Life of the
Years 30th to 59th of 19th Century”. Berezovaya
L. G. Istoriya russkoy kul’tury XVIII —
nachala XX v. Moscow: Yurayt, 2017. 213—
233. (In Russian).
2. Brazhnikov I. L. Historiosophical Text of Russian
Re volution in the 20th Century Fine Literature and
Opi nion Writing, Extended Abstract of Dr. Sci.
(Philos.) Dissertation. Moscow, 2011. 40 p. (In
Russian).
3. Vernadskiy V. I. Philosophical Thoughts of a Naturalist,
[collected works]. Moscow: Nauka,
1988. 519 p. (In Russian).
4. Vorob’yev V. V. Cultural Linguistics (Theory and
Methods). Moscow: RUDN Univ. Publ., 1997.
331 p. (In Russian).
5. Ilyin I. A. The Path of Spiritual Renewal. Mo scow:
AST-AST Moskva, 2006. 366 p. (In Russian).
6. Karamzin N. M. Opinion of Russian Citizen. Selected
Opinion Writings. Moscow: Yurayt, 2018.
277 p. (In Russian). Antologiya mysli.
7. Milyukov” P. An Outline of History Russian Culture.
Part 2. Church and School (Faith, Creative
Work, Education). St. Petersburg, 1897. viii,
367 p. (In Russian).
8. Samsonova N. G., Starchenko N. N. “Russian
Intelligentsia: Past and Present”. Proshloye i budushcheye
rossiyskoy intelligentsii, collection of
studies. Ed. A. N. Chumakov. Moscow: Prospekt,
2016. 7—14. (In Russian).
9. Solovyev Vl. S. Lectures on Godmanhood. Wisdom
Writings. Vol. 2. Moscow: Pravda, 1989. 735 p.
(In Russian). 2 vols.
10. Fedotov G. P. On Sainthood, Intelligentsia and
Bolshevism, collected papers. St. Petersburg:
St. Pe tersburg Univ. Publ., 1994. 149 p. (In
Rus sian). Literaturnoye naslediye russkikh
mys liteley.
11. Chaadaev P. Ya. Philosophical Letters. Moscow:
RIMIS, 2011. 268 p. (In Russian).
Noospheric globalization in the context of the sustainable development model
Written by A. V. Guryanova, A. V. Timofeevdoi: 10.24151/2409-1073-2023-1-103-110
Abstract. Aim. To correlate the conception of the noosphere by V. I. Vernadsky with the model
of sustainable development that is relevant for nowadays, to assess the conditions for its realization
and perspectives in the context of noospheric globalization. Methodology. The concept of “noosphere”
and the nuances of its terminological application are consistently considered; as well as the phenomenon
of noospheric globalization infl uenced by the scientifi c thought and anthropogenic factor.
The conception of the noosphere is presented as the worldview basis of the model of sustainable development.
The main methods are comparative and integrative. Results. The concepts of “noosphere”,
“noospheric globalization”, “sustainable development” are correlated. It’s concluded that sustainable
development is impossible without the noospheric principles and ideas implementation, and
the appearance of the noosphere is connected with the sustainable development formation. Its
characters are the rational use of natural resources and the balanced economic growth. Research
implications. The classical theme of the noosphere has been renewed by placing in the context of
the sustainable development conception that is relevant to nowadays. The ways of correlation between
these theoretical constructs are outlined. The necessity of noospheric globali zation in the
process of modern socio-economic development is substantiated.
Keywords: scientifi c thought, noosphere, noospheric globalization, sustainable development,
human being
For citation: Guryanova A. V., Timofeev A. V. “Noospheric Globalization in the Context of
the Sustainable Development Model”. Economic and Social Research 1 (37) 2023: 103—110. (In
Russian). https://doi.org/10.24151/2409-1073-2023-1-103-110
References
1. Vernadsky V. I. Scientifi c Knowledge. Scientifi c
creative work. Scientifi c Thought. Dubna: Feniks,
1997. 576 p. (In Russian). Vol. 1 of Vernadsky
V. I. On Science. 2 vols. 1997—2002.
2. Grachev V. A. “Vernadsky’s V. I. Theory of
Noosphere as the Basis for Sustainable Development”.
Yug Rossii: ekologiya, razvitiye =
[The] South of Russia: Ecology, Development
10.3 (2015): 16—23. (In Russian). https://doi.
org/10.18470/1992-1098-2015-3-16-23
3. Guryanov N. Y., Guryanova A. V. “Digital Globalization
in the Context of Digital Economy
and Digital Technologies Development”. Vestnik
Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta.
Seriya: Filosofskiye nauki = Bulletin of the
Moscow State Regional University. Series Philosophy
3 (2020): 63—69. (In Russian). https://doi.
org/10.18384/2310-7227-2020-3-63-69
4. Guryanova A. V., Zhdanova V. V. “Ecophilosophy
as a worldview basis of globalization and
digitalization”. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo
oblastnogo universiteta. Ser. Filosofskiye
nauki = Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional
University. Series Philosophy 1 (2022): 76—84.
(In Russian). https://doi.org/10 18384/2310-
7227-2022-1-76-84
5. Pashkova N. V., Kuzemina E. F. “Philosophical
Understanding of the Concept of ‘Noosphere’
in the Era of Technization: Opportunities and
Problems”. Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii = Intellect.
Innovations. Investments 6 (2022): 62—68.
(In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-
7175-2022-6-62
6. Subetto A. I., Shanti Dz. P. (Mahatma Shanti),
Lukoyanov V. V. “Noospherism as a New
Paradigm of Mankind Survival on Earth”, scientifi
c report. XIII World Congress of Science,
2021 (St Petersburg — Geneva — Paris). Sci. ed.
V. V. Semikin. St Petersburg: Asterion, 2021.
60 p. (In Russian).
7. Ursul A. D. The Phenomenon of the Noosphere:
Global Evolution and Noospherogenesis, [monograph].
Moscow: URSS — Lenand, 2015. 336 p.
(In Russian).
8. Guryanova A., Astafeva N., Filatova N., Khafi
yatullina N., Guryanov N. “Global Crisis:
Overcoming the Uncertainty of the Concept
in the Philosophical Paradigm of Globalization”.
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
(LNNS) 57 The Future of the Global Financial
System: Downfall or Harmony (2019): 836—843.
9. Guryanova A. V., Petinova M. A., Gur yanov
N. Yu. “Socio-Economic Problems and
Perspectives of Globalization in the Context of
Coronavirus Pandemic”. Lecture Notes in Networks
and Systems (LNNS) 160 Economic Systems
in the New Era: Stable Systems in an Unstable
World (2021): 567—573.
10. Guryanova A. V., Shestakov A. A., Tikhonov
V. A. “Digital Globalization as a Result of
the Modern Economic and Technological Development”.
Proceedings of Global Challenges
and Prospects of The Modern Economic Development
(GCPMED 2020), Samara, Russian Federation,
December 15—16, 2020. Samara: Samara
State University of Economics, 2021. 787—792.
Vol. 106 of European Proceedings of Social and
Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS).